w2lsh51的部落格

How To Determine the Best Air Purifier Technology That Matches Your Needs

Here's a sudden check of what's in the air, what impair it can have, and the sunday-go-to-meeting 9 air sterilizer technologies free for it's removal:

Think Of There Being 3 Kinds of "Stuff" To Remove From The Air:

#1 Large substance - dust, hair, pollen, sensual dander

#2 Gas substance - odor, chemicals, vapors

#3 Living Stuff - Mold, mildew, bacteria, germs, viruses

This Is Bad For Your Health. Here's Why:

#1 Dust, hair, pollen, physical exfoliation = allergies, asthma, odors

#2 Chemicals, megrims = odors, chemical sensitivity, condition association stress

#3 Mold, mildew, bacteria, germs, viruses = condition net (colds, flu, viruses), and odors

There are 9-10 Basic Technologies to Capture, Kill, Or Remove "Stuff":

#1 HEPA, Pre-filter, Neg/Ion, Plasma Grid = Helpful for allergies and asthma, some odors

#2 Carbon, Charcoal, Ozone, Zeolite = Helpful for odors, smoke, physical smells, chemical sensitivity, and protecting our condition system

#3 UV, TiO2, Plasma Grid, Ceramic = Helpful for immune set of connections security (colds, flu, viruses, pathogens), and eliminating stale odors

The "Pro's" and "Cons" of Each Air Purifier Technology

Top 10 Purification Technologies and What They Do (In Chronological writ)

1. Charcoal Filters (1854) - Absorbs scent and whatsoever gases.

Pros: Good for smoke, pet odor, and dangerous haze. Inexpensive.

Cons: None.

2. Ozone (O2) (1881) - Ozone is what you can sense impression in the air after a storm. It's chemical element near an added negatively charged bit attached which is explosive and solitary lasts a ordinal but does a excessive job on odor, mold, etc.

Pros: It kills odors in good health than thing other. Kills spoiling and cast. Good for chemic discarding as economically. (I emotion a petite Ozone which I bend on a few hours since bed to formulate the liberty genuinely hot and immaculate)

Cons: In pocket-size amounts (low rank) it is not detrimental and totally hard-hitting. (Consumer Reports blasted Sharper Image/Ionic Breeze because their component put out incredibly advanced levels of Ozone. As a end product fatefully frequent relatives are now appalled of ozone)

Note: Because of Sharper Image Manufacturers are now either 1) avoiding Ozone 2) business it "Activated Oxygen" 3) putt timers on Ozone

3. HEPA (1934) - HEPA filters trap up to 99.97% of dust, pollen, dander, etc. Many manufacturers all the same move out it out because of the business disbursal.

Pros: Very paying special attention for allergies, dog/cat hair, spore etc. A must for asthmatics

Cons: HEPA filters have to be replaced, but they drudgery exceedingly okay. Replacement filters are naturally expensive (like trained worker cartridges) so fix your eyes on for a Purifier Brand whose replacement costs are reasonable (maybe $20-40 depending on the scope/thickness).

4. UV Light (1936) - UV feathery kills many an pathogens such as as mold, viruses, germs and bacterium. (Used in hospitals) .

Pros: beside today's pathogens and germs strains UV is a terrible postscript - specially if you have children, asthma, or condition challenges.

Cons: You have to renew the rhizome(s) both period or so. Like with HEPA label in no doubt the Manufacturer isn't "soaking" you for superior changeover costs. Don't pay much than $20-30 for a rhizome.

5. Negative Ion (1974)- Negative Ion is a productive entry for removing few pollen, smog, and several particulate. The matutinal ionizers would take home your walls dark because the negatively charged grime would grip to the walls say the section. That's now taken guardianship of by grating plates.

Pros: Very low-priced practice for improvement the air.

Cons: It works all right in mix beside other than technologies but it's not thoroughly hard-hitting by itself.

6. Ceramic - Uses grill wrong a enclosure to put to death pathogens in the air as air is worn into and done the enclosure. (This is too how a febricity building complex in our body, increasing the warmth to termination a infective agent).

Pros: Heat kills pathogens.

Cons: Most experts admit UV does a a cut above job, near a lot smaller amount electricity. You don't see heaps of these filters for that basis.

7. Washable Pre-Filters - This essentially catches pelt and oversize mobile particles. Most purifiers have these.

Pros: Very two-a-penny extension by manufacturers. . It as well extends the existence of the other filters.

Cons: None

8. Ti02 Photo-Catalytic (1991) - Enhances the UV low-density up to 4000% to kill germs, viruses, mold, bacteria, as it passes done the device.

Pros: What's very good is now the UV stalk doesn't have to be as sturdy or as big yet complex more than efficaciously. Cons: None.

9. Plasma Dust (or Grid) Filters (1989) - Uses a negatively charged power grid salver to shower the incoming air near both complimentary and denial ions. Removes quite a lot of mobile particles and whatever micro-organisms. I wouldn't reckon on this unsocial but it will do whatever cleaning as you'll see when the plates get dust-covered. It's essentially an ionizer on steroids. The "Never wishes a deputy filter" types (Ionic Breeze, Oreck) tumble into this family. (Note: You never entail a permutation device because your lungs are filtering what it doesn't do a suitable job on)

Pros: You can swab it.

Cons: Works well, but wishes other than technologies to do a well-mannered job.

Video Demonstration Of Each

You can monitor videos on all technology at my YouTube furrow called AliveAir.

#10 New Air Technology From Japan: Pollen, Odor, Dust Sensors I deliberation this is highly precooled and intensely effectual.The Japanese have developed sensors that find pollen, odor, and particulate in the air.

Pros: Saves physical phenomenon and estimate as you can give the element on "Auto" all the instance. I come up with it's the highest point for hypersensitivity reaction and respiratory disease hindrance. The sensors revolve the technologies on/off /low/high depending on the desires of the area.

Cons: None.